^

Opinion

Readers’ questions

US IMMIGRATION NOTES - Atty Marco F.G. Tomakin - The Freeman

This week I received a few questions from readers and clients regarding their immigration situation. Let’s discuss them here:

Q1: I was born here in the US. My wife and I have been married for more than 10 years now. It has been five years now since she obtained her greencard through the spousal petition I filed for her. What eligibility criteria should she use when she files for application for naturalization?

A1: Her situation presents two ways in which she qualifies for naturalization. One is through the five-year lawful permanent residency and the other is through the three-year rule which is marriage and living with a US citizen spouse in the last three years, three years have passed since obtaining a greencard and the spouse has been a US citizen for at least three years, in this case, since birth. Either of these two qualifies the wife for naturalization. However, picking the first option (the five-year permanent residency eligibility) is easier, more straightforward and there is less need for proof. If you take the second option of three-year rule, you would have to provide more evidence of the marriage, thus needing more information and documents.

Q2: I was arrested for an offense involving sexual misconduct back when I was a minor. I was sentenced to and served some years under probation. Eventually I completed it and my court records were sealed. I am now applying for naturalization. Should I tell USCIS of my conviction even if my criminal record was sealed?

A2: Yes. Even if your prior criminal conviction was sealed, you would have to divulge your arrest, charges, and conviction as a matter of requirement. Immigration law requires disclosure of criminal history. A conviction either sealed or expunged does not exempt such disclosure requirement.

Q3: I am involved in a criminal case in my country as a co-conspirator of fraud. Can I apply for asylum due to the fact that I think the cases filed against me are designed in order for me to serve as a witness in order to testify against the main suspect who happens to be a politician?

A3: This question is very loaded with a lot of entanglements. A criminal defense attorney and an immigration attorney should carefully tread on this complex legal issue. As a general rule, asylum to the US is only limited to very specify instances of persecution --race, nationality, religion, political opinion, and membership to a particular group or class. It looks like you are being prosecuted, not persecuted, for a criminal offense and the basis of which is your participation in a crime of fraud.

vuukle comment

US

Philstar
x
  • Latest
Latest
Latest
abtest
Are you sure you want to log out?
X
Login

Philstar.com is one of the most vibrant, opinionated, discerning communities of readers on cyberspace. With your meaningful insights, help shape the stories that can shape the country. Sign up now!

Get Updated:

Signup for the News Round now

FORGOT PASSWORD?
SIGN IN
or sign in with