Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 594663
                    [Title] => Inconsequential
                    [Summary] => 
Is the cause or reason for the issuance of a check material in determining liability under the bouncing checks law? This is one of the issues raised and answered in this case of Lina.
                    [DatePublished] => 2010-07-20 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [1] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 314905
                    [Title] => Unconvincing evidence
                    [Summary] => Is the principle of conspiracy under the Revised Penal Code applicable to violations of B.P. Blg. 22 or the Bouncing Checks Law? In other words can a person be held liable for the issuance of a bouncing check by another person on the ground that the act of one is the act of all? This is the question answered in this case of the spouses Rey and Lina.


                    [DatePublished] => 2006-01-03 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

SO LINA

Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 594663
                    [Title] => Inconsequential
                    [Summary] => 
Is the cause or reason for the issuance of a check material in determining liability under the bouncing checks law? This is one of the issues raised and answered in this case of Lina.
                    [DatePublished] => 2010-07-20 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [1] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 314905
                    [Title] => Unconvincing evidence
                    [Summary] => Is the principle of conspiracy under the Revised Penal Code applicable to violations of B.P. Blg. 22 or the Bouncing Checks Law? In other words can a person be held liable for the issuance of a bouncing check by another person on the ground that the act of one is the act of all? This is the question answered in this case of the spouses Rey and Lina.


                    [DatePublished] => 2006-01-03 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

abtest

Inconsequential

By A LAW EACH DAY (KEEPS TROUBLE AWAY) | By Jose C. Sison | July 20, 2010 - 12:00am

Is the cause or reason for the issuance of a check material in determining liability under the bouncing checks law? This is one of the issues raised and answered in this case of Lina.

Opinion

Unconvincing evidence

By A LAW EACH DAY (KEEPS TROUBLE AWAY) | By Jose C. Sison | January 3, 2006 - 12:00am

Is the principle of conspiracy under the Revised Penal Code applicable to violations of B.P. Blg. 22 or the Bouncing Checks Law? In other words can a person be held liable for the issuance of a bouncing check by...

Opinion