+ Follow PRESUMPTION Tag
PRESUMPTION
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 1481663
[Title] => Drawing the line on speculation-based assessments
[Summary] => Presumptions strike at the very core of the way we as individuals pass judgment.
[DatePublished] => 2015-07-27 10:00:00
[ColumnID] => 136078
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1516102
[AuthorName] => Michael Angelo D. Adrid
[SectionName] => Business
[SectionUrl] => business
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 1416275
[Title] => Between despair and presumption
[Summary] => That's the virtue of hope, the virtue most needed these days as we face more trials and challenges in our life, personal, family, social and national. It's a way of coping.
[DatePublished] => 2015-01-24 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134343
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1096945
[AuthorName] => Fr. Roy Cimagala
[SectionName] => Freeman Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[2] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 1311019
[Title] => Miriam: Pro-RH groups should appeal SC decision
[Summary] => Senator Miriam Defensor Santiago wants supporters of the Reproductive Health Law to file a motion for reconsideration on the eight provisions struck down by the Supreme Court (SC) as unconstitutional.
[DatePublished] => 2014-04-10 11:59:18
[ColumnID] => 0
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] =>
[AuthorName] =>
[SectionName] => Headlines
[SectionUrl] => headlines
[URL] => http://media.philstar.com/images/the-philippine-star/headlines/20140410/Senator-Miriam-Defensor-Santiago.jpg
)
[3] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 538444
[Title] => EDITORIAL - RFID unconstitutional, oppressive
[Summary] => The public should rise up in protest against the implementation of the so-called RFID, or Radio Frequency Identification Device, by the Land Transportation Office.
[DatePublished] => 2010-01-07 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] =>
[AuthorName] =>
[SectionName] => Freeman Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[4] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 530088
[Title] => Presumed innocent
[Summary] => The Constitution says that “the accused shall be presumed innocent until the contrary is proved” (Art. III of Section 14(2).
[DatePublished] => 2009-12-08 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[5] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 440547
[Title] => EDITORIAL: Legislators killing democracy faster than communists
[Summary] => One of the clearest signs that a democratic society is in decay is when one of its most solid and trusted foundations begins to crack. One such foundation is the democratic principle of presumption of innocence.
[DatePublished] => 2009-02-16 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] =>
[AuthorName] =>
[SectionName] => Freeman Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[6] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 245991
[Title] => Shifting burdens
[Summary] => If a plaintiff or party having the burden of proof introduces evidence establishing a presumption that his assertions by themselves are true and correct, the burden of proof is still not shifted to the defendant or his adversary; it merely places on the defendant the burden of producing evidence to rebut that presumption and create a state of equipoise between the proof of both parties so that the burden to establish the case by preponderance of evidence remains with the plaintiff.
[DatePublished] => 2004-04-13 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
abtest
January 7, 2010 - 12:00am
February 16, 2009 - 12:00am
