+ Follow MS. CASTRO Tag
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 1422894
[Title] => An argument for the regionalization of the bar exam
[Summary] => For two successive days, we witnessed the unraveling of the national tragedy called the Mamasapano massacre thru live television.
[DatePublished] => 2015-02-12 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 135054
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1096513
[AuthorName] => Aven Piramide
[SectionName] => Freeman Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 303881
[Title] => Perjury
[Summary] => The elements of perjury under article 183 of the Revised Penal Code are: (a) that the accused made a statement under oath or executed an affidavit upon a material matter; (b) that the statement or affidavit was made before a competent officer authorized to receive and administer oath; (c) that in the statement or affidavit, the accused made a willful and deliberate assertion of falsehood; and (d) that the sworn statement or affidavit containing the falsity is required by law or made for a legal purpose. This case of Mr. Prado and Mr. Perlas explains elements (a) and (c).
[DatePublished] => 2005-10-27 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
MS. CASTRO
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 1422894
[Title] => An argument for the regionalization of the bar exam
[Summary] => For two successive days, we witnessed the unraveling of the national tragedy called the Mamasapano massacre thru live television.
[DatePublished] => 2015-02-12 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 135054
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1096513
[AuthorName] => Aven Piramide
[SectionName] => Freeman Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 303881
[Title] => Perjury
[Summary] => The elements of perjury under article 183 of the Revised Penal Code are: (a) that the accused made a statement under oath or executed an affidavit upon a material matter; (b) that the statement or affidavit was made before a competent officer authorized to receive and administer oath; (c) that in the statement or affidavit, the accused made a willful and deliberate assertion of falsehood; and (d) that the sworn statement or affidavit containing the falsity is required by law or made for a legal purpose. This case of Mr. Prado and Mr. Perlas explains elements (a) and (c).
[DatePublished] => 2005-10-27 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
abtest
