Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 366609
                    [Title] => A non-precedent?
                    [Summary] => 






Let’s make this clear right at the outset. At the moment, as a result of the Supreme Court’s decision in Lambino, et al. vs. Comelec, the prevailing rule on People’s Initiative (PI) in this country is clear. 


                    [DatePublished] => 2006-11-02 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 134872
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1531995
                    [AuthorName] => MY VIEWPOINT  By Ricardo V. Puno Jr.
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

MR. ASSOCIATE JUSTICE ANTONIO CARPIO

Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 366609
                    [Title] => A non-precedent?
                    [Summary] => 






Let’s make this clear right at the outset. At the moment, as a result of the Supreme Court’s decision in Lambino, et al. vs. Comelec, the prevailing rule on People’s Initiative (PI) in this country is clear. 


                    [DatePublished] => 2006-11-02 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 134872
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1531995
                    [AuthorName] => MY VIEWPOINT  By Ricardo V. Puno Jr.
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

abtest

A non-precedent?

By MY VIEWPOINT | By MY VIEWPOINT By Ricardo V. Puno Jr. | November 2, 2006 - 12:00am

Let’s make this clear right at the outset. At the moment, as a result of the Supreme Court’s decision in Lambino, et al. vs. Comelec, the prevailing rule on People’s Initiative (PI) in...

Opinion