+ Follow MANG AMBO Tag
MANG AMBO
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 347319
[Title] => Salamat, hinango mo ako sa putikan! (95)
[Summary] => "SAAN tayo pupunta, iha?" tanong ni Mang Frank nang nasa kotse na kami.
"Sa Constancia St. po sa Sampaloc."
[DatePublished] => 2006-07-14 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1713511
[AuthorName] => Ronnie M. Halos
[SectionName] => True Confessions
[SectionUrl] => true-confessions
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 346251
[Title] => Salamat, hinango mo ako sa putikan! (Ika-89 na labas)
[Summary] => (Batay sa kasaysayan ng isang nagpapatago sa pangalang Che)
HINDI ako makakilos sa pagkakataong iyon. Gipit na ako. Kung tatakbo ako, tiyak na aabutan at malay ko kung ano ang gagawin sa akin ng lalaking ito.
[DatePublished] => 2006-07-08 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1713511
[AuthorName] => Ronnie M. Halos
[SectionName] => True Confessions
[SectionUrl] => true-confessions
[URL] =>
)
[2] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 256214
[Title] => Kabit system
[Summary] => KASO ito ni Mang Ambo, isang jeepney operator na walang prangkisa subalit hawak niya ang isang linya ng ruta sa pamamagitan ng kabit system.
Una niyang ikinabit ang kanyang jeepney sa prankisa ni Aling Lita. Subalit, isang araw ay naaksidente ang isa sa mga jeepney ni Aling Lita. Sa takot na makasama ang kanyang jeepney sa kaso dahil nakapangalan ito sa pamamagitan ng kabit system, agad siyang tumiwalag dito. Sa ikalawang pagkakataon ay ikinabit niya ang kanyang jeepney kay Mang Donato, may-ari ng prangkisa.
[DatePublished] => 2004-07-03 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134393
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => PSN Opinyon
[SectionUrl] => opinyon
[URL] =>
)
[3] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 254272
[Title] => Hidden behind illegal act
[Summary] => This is the case of Mang Ambo, a jeepney operator who has no franchise or certificate of public convenience to operate his passenger jeepney. Nevertheless, he was able to operate his jeepney at a fixed route or line somewhere in a Southern City under the kabit system.
[DatePublished] => 2004-06-17 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[4] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 223612
[Title] => Kaso ng notaryo publiko
[Summary] => MULA 1960, nangungupahan na si Mang Ambo sa lupang pag-aari ni Don Leon. Noong 1975, nagulat na lamang siya nang kunin mula sa kanya ang pamumusesyon dito ng mag-asawang Efren at Norma. Kinuwestyun ito ni Mang Ambo hanggang Court of Appeals kung saan nanalo at kinilala siya bilang legal na nangungupahan sa nasabing lupa noong Agosto 13, 1988.
[DatePublished] => 2003-10-09 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134393
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => PSN Opinyon
[SectionUrl] => opinyon
[URL] =>
)
[5] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 195595
[Title] => Parable of the Lobster
[Summary] => Once upon a time, in the center of Manhattan, there was a big American restaurant owned by a husband and wife team, "MONO" and "POLY" that served lobsters of every kind. They offered lobster thermidor, lobster aus jus, lobster de ajo, grilled lobster, steamed lobster, and every other lobster concoction imaginable.
[DatePublished] => 2003-02-16 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134315
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] =>
[AuthorName] =>
[SectionName] => Business
[SectionUrl] => business
[URL] =>
)
[6] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 188271
[Title] => Maling tagapagmana
[Summary] => KASO ito ng dalawang ektaryang lupaing pang-agrikultura na pag-aari ni Don Mariano, na sinasaka ni Mang Ambo bilang nangungupahan. Si Nilo, anak ni Don Mariano at Atty.-in-fact, ang tumatanggap ng renta mula sa 40 kaban ng palay kada ektarya. Ang mga kaban ng palay ay ibinibigay kay Diego, ang katiwala ng pamilya Mariano sa loob ng 16 taon na. Si Diego ang may awtoridad na kumolekta ng bayad, mag-isyu ng resibo at magtinda ng mga produkto ng lupain tulad ng mangga at kawayan.
[DatePublished] => 2002-12-17 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134393
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => PSN Opinyon
[SectionUrl] => opinyon
[URL] =>
)
[7] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 180068
[Title] => No clear and absolute intention
[Summary] => This case is about the Agrarian Reform Law particularly PD 27. Pursuant to the said law, farmer- tenants were deemed owners of the land they were tilling constituting a family size farm of five(5) hectares if not irrigated and three(3) hectares if irrigated. The Law emancipated the farmer-tenants as it gave them the rights to possess, cultivate and enjoy for themselves the landholdings primarily devoted to rice and corn under a system of sharecrop or lease tenancy. Can the said lands be transferred to another because of abandonment by the farmer beneficiary?
[DatePublished] => 2002-10-16 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
abtest
February 16, 2003 - 12:00am
