^
+ Follow KARL POPPER Tag
KARL POPPER
Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 1268271
                    [Title] => How to remove a tyrannous president
                    [Summary] => 

Constitutional reform advocates have pointed to the superiority of parliamentary government from a presidential system.

[DatePublished] => 2013-12-15 00:00:00 [ColumnID] => 134199 [Focus] => 0 [AuthorID] => 1804784 [AuthorName] => Carmen N. Pedrosa [SectionName] => Opinion [SectionUrl] => opinion [URL] => ) [1] => Array ( [ArticleID] => 728006 [Title] => The role of media to inform the public about mining; What Gibo and others must do [Summary] =>

After recriminations came regrets.

[DatePublished] => 2011-09-18 00:00:00 [ColumnID] => 134199 [Focus] => 0 [AuthorID] => 1804784 [AuthorName] => Carmen N. Pedrosa [SectionName] => Opinion [SectionUrl] => opinion [URL] => ) [2] => Array ( [ArticleID] => 561345 [Title] => Mobocracy or government through mobs [Summary] =>

The recent threat of Noynoy to lead massive street protests against the Supreme Court ruling that allowed President GMA to appoint the next chief justice shows he is running true to form.

[DatePublished] => 2010-03-27 00:00:00 [ColumnID] => 134199 [Focus] => 0 [AuthorID] => 1804784 [AuthorName] => Carmen N. Pedrosa [SectionName] => Opinion [SectionUrl] => opinion [URL] => ) [3] => Array ( [ArticleID] => 230661 [Title] => Constitutional change is a candidate [Summary] => Karl Popper, the great guru of modern democracy based his teachings on an understanding of the basic principles of knowledge — what we can know and what we cannot know. In politics, it implies if we cannot predict if an elected president no matter how many promises he or she makes will be good. We are in surer ground if we were instead to reject candidates who would make not only a bad president but would endanger democracy. The same theory of knowledge applies to our approach to constitutional reform. [DatePublished] => 2003-12-07 00:00:00 [ColumnID] => 134199 [Focus] => 0 [AuthorID] => 1327965 [AuthorName] => FROM A DISTANCE By Carmen Pedrosa [SectionName] => Opinion [SectionUrl] => opinion [URL] => ) [4] => Array ( [ArticleID] => 102351 [Title] => Reply to Mr. Lee Kuan Yew - FROM A DISTANCE by Carmen N. Pedrosa [Summary] => Democracy vs. authori-tarianism. There are two ways to view Lee Kuan Yew’s off-the-cuff criticism of EDSA 2. We can view it positively. Coming from Asia’s most respected statesman, his acerbic comment gives it welcome importance. The venerable Lee Kuan Yew would never understand people power anyway, being the guardian of authoritarian government. He belongs to that school of thought which subscribes to authority as the sole arbiter of what is good for a country. [DatePublished] => 2001-01-27 00:00:00 [ColumnID] => 133272 [Focus] => 0 [AuthorID] => [AuthorName] => [SectionName] => Opinion [SectionUrl] => opinion [URL] => ) ) )
abtest
Are you sure you want to log out?
X
Login

Philstar.com is one of the most vibrant, opinionated, discerning communities of readers on cyberspace. With your meaningful insights, help shape the stories that can shape the country. Sign up now!

Get Updated:

Signup for the News Round now

FORGOT PASSWORD?
SIGN IN
or sign in with