JANUARY FEBRUARY

Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 203463
                    [Title] => Terminated without prejudice
                    [Summary] => The general rule is that dismissal of a criminal case resulting in the acquittal made with the express consent of the accused or upon his own motion will not place the accused in double jeopardy thus allowing its revival. But are there instances when the criminal case dismissed with the accused’s consent may amount to double jeopardy as to prevent its revival? This is answered in this case of Benny.


                    [DatePublished] => 2003-04-23 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

abtest

Terminated without prejudice

By A LAW EACH DAY (KEEPS TROUBLE AWAY) | By Jose C. Sison | April 23, 2003 - 12:00am

The general rule is that dismissal of a criminal case resulting in the acquittal made with the express consent of the accused or upon his own motion will not place the accused in double jeopardy thus allowing its...

Opinion