Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 780264
                    [Title] => De Lima testimony considered hearsay, but stays on record
                    [Summary] => 
The testimony is hearsay, but the statements based on dissenting opinions in the Supreme Court will remain in the records of the impeachment court.
                    [DatePublished] => 2012-02-24 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133272
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1096615
                    [AuthorName] =>  Christina Mendez
                    [SectionName] => Headlines
                    [SectionUrl] => headlines
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [1] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 748799
                    [Title] => Dissenting opinion on Arroyo's travel ban
                    [Summary] => 
Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonio Carpio revealed his dissenting opinion on the ongoing debates on whether former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo would be allowed to travel abroad for medical treatment.
                    [DatePublished] => 2011-11-17 15:37:25
                    [ColumnID] => 133272
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 
                    [AuthorName] => 
                    [SectionName] => 
                    [SectionUrl] => 
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [2] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 229691
                    [Title] => End of the road for Amari — SC official
                    [Summary] => The Amari Coastal Bay Development Corp. no longer has any legal recourse to overturn the Supreme Court’s final decision declaring its land deal with the Public Estates Authority (PEA) as unconstitutional, a Supreme Court official said yesterday.


The Supreme Court, voting 7-7-1, ruled with finality last Nov. 11 that Amari’s land deal with PEA is unconstitutional and void ab initio (from the beginning), junking a second motion for reconsideration by the two appellants.


                    [DatePublished] => 2003-11-29 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133272
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804901
                    [AuthorName] => Aurea Calica
                    [SectionName] => Headlines
                    [SectionUrl] => headlines
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

DISSENTING

Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 780264
                    [Title] => De Lima testimony considered hearsay, but stays on record
                    [Summary] => 
The testimony is hearsay, but the statements based on dissenting opinions in the Supreme Court will remain in the records of the impeachment court.
                    [DatePublished] => 2012-02-24 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133272
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1096615
                    [AuthorName] =>  Christina Mendez
                    [SectionName] => Headlines
                    [SectionUrl] => headlines
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [1] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 748799
                    [Title] => Dissenting opinion on Arroyo's travel ban
                    [Summary] => 
Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonio Carpio revealed his dissenting opinion on the ongoing debates on whether former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo would be allowed to travel abroad for medical treatment.
                    [DatePublished] => 2011-11-17 15:37:25
                    [ColumnID] => 133272
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 
                    [AuthorName] => 
                    [SectionName] => 
                    [SectionUrl] => 
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [2] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 229691
                    [Title] => End of the road for Amari — SC official
                    [Summary] => The Amari Coastal Bay Development Corp. no longer has any legal recourse to overturn the Supreme Court’s final decision declaring its land deal with the Public Estates Authority (PEA) as unconstitutional, a Supreme Court official said yesterday.


The Supreme Court, voting 7-7-1, ruled with finality last Nov. 11 that Amari’s land deal with PEA is unconstitutional and void ab initio (from the beginning), junking a second motion for reconsideration by the two appellants.


                    [DatePublished] => 2003-11-29 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133272
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804901
                    [AuthorName] => Aurea Calica
                    [SectionName] => Headlines
                    [SectionUrl] => headlines
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

abtest

De Lima testimony considered hearsay, but stays on record

By Christina Mendez | February 24, 2012 - 12:00am

The testimony is hearsay, but the statements based on dissenting opinions in the Supreme Court will remain in the records of the impeachment court.

Headlines

Dissenting opinion on Arroyo's travel ban

November 17, 2011 - 3:37pm

Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonio Carpio revealed his dissenting opinion on the ongoing debates on whether former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo would be allowed to travel abroad for medical treatment.

End of the road for Amari — SC official

By Aurea Calica | November 29, 2003 - 12:00am

The Amari Coastal Bay Development Corp. no longer has any legal recourse to overturn the Supreme Court’s final decision declaring its land deal with the Public Estates Authority (PEA) as unconstitutional, a...

Headlines