^
+ Follow Anti-Wire Tapping Act Tag
Anti-Wire Tapping Act
Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 1978318
                    [Title] => 'Wiretapping' or 'ambush' interview? Here's what the Anti-Wiretapping Law says
                    [Summary] => But PCIJ claimed in a subsequent statement that Martires was fully aware that he was being recorded the entire time.
                    [DatePublished] => 2019-12-19 21:46:00
                    [ColumnID] => 0
                    [Focus] => 1
                    [AuthorID] => 1806533
                    [AuthorName] => Franco Luna
                    [SectionName] => Headlines
                    [SectionUrl] => headlines
                    [URL] => https://media.philstar.com/photos/2019/12/19/ambush-interview-mong-pintolo_2019-12-19_21-46-53_thumbnail.jpg
                )

            [1] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 1808315
                    [Title] => Kalaboso ang pulis
                    [Summary] => ANG kasong ito ay tungkol sa paglabag sa RA 4200 o ang tinatawag natin na “Anti-Wire Tapping Act”. 
                    [DatePublished] => 2018-04-22 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 136363
                    [Focus] => 1
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => PSN Opinyon
                    [SectionUrl] => opinyon
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [2] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 1791990
                    [Title] => Legitimate mode
                    [Summary] => 

RA 4200, or the Anti-Wire Tapping Act, prohibits the secret overhearing, intercepting or recording of private communications or spoken word by means of tapping any wire or cable or of using any other device or arrangement like Dictaphone, Dictagraph or detectaphone or walkie-talkie or tape recorder. This is the law involved in this case.

[DatePublished] => 2018-02-28 00:00:00 [ColumnID] => 133340 [Focus] => 1 [AuthorID] => 1804883 [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison [SectionName] => Opinion [SectionUrl] => opinion [URL] => ) [3] => Array ( [ArticleID] => 472739 [Title] => The joys of twitting [Summary] =>

There have been so many developments in this frenetic world that I can’t keep up.

[DatePublished] => 2009-05-31 00:00:00 [ColumnID] => 134681 [Focus] => 0 [AuthorID] => 1420927 [AuthorName] => Joseph Gonzales [SectionName] => Freeman Opinion [SectionUrl] => opinion [URL] => ) [4] => Array ( [ArticleID] => 296972 [Title] => Unanswered legal questions [Summary] => If we have to move forward but continue the search for truth in the current political crisis, the Supreme Court (SC) should take cognizance of, and give due course to the pending petitions filed before it questioning the Lower House’s action on the report of its justice committee. A definitive ruling on the issues raised therein would certainly go a long way in preventing a repetition of the tumultuous process that occurred during the last impeachment hearing that was characterized by sharp differences of opinion on apparently clear and simple rules. [DatePublished] => 2005-09-16 00:00:00 [ColumnID] => 133340 [Focus] => 0 [AuthorID] => 1804883 [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison [SectionName] => Opinion [SectionUrl] => opinion [URL] => ) [5] => Array ( [ArticleID] => 289599 [Title] => Eavesdropping not wiretapping [Summary] => Is the use of telephone extension to overhear a private conversation prohibited by RA 4200 otherwise known as the Anti-Wire Tapping Act? More specifically in this case, could a person called over the telephone and his lawyer listening on an extension line be imprisoned for violation of said law simply because the extension was used to enable them to both listen to an alleged attempt at extortion? This is the issue resolved in this case of Mario and Manny both lawyers.
[DatePublished] => 2005-08-03 00:00:00 [ColumnID] => 133340 [Focus] => 0 [AuthorID] => 1804883 [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison [SectionName] => Opinion [SectionUrl] => opinion [URL] => ) [6] => Array ( [ArticleID] => 138724 [Title] => Ang tape recorder bilang ebidensiya [Summary] => Si Mike at Jim ay mga radio reporters. Minsang nakasaksi sila sa isang nightclub ng mga babaing hubad na nagsasayaw, pinalabas sila ng puwersahan ng mga bodyguards at may-ari ng nightclub. Nagtungo ang dalawa sa pulisya upang ireport ang nasaksihan nila. Nadatnan nila ang tatlong pulis, at ang isa rito ay si Bert. Inaya pa sila ng mga ito na mag-inuman ngunit tumanggi sila at lumapit sa desk officer. Siya namang pagdating ng may-ari ng nightclub kasama ang mga bodyguards. Kinausap ng mga ito si Bert. Pagkaraan ng 15 minuto’y hinarap ni Bert sina Mike at Jim. [DatePublished] => 2001-11-01 00:00:00 [ColumnID] => 134393 [Focus] => 0 [AuthorID] => 1804883 [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison [SectionName] => PSN Opinyon [SectionUrl] => opinyon [URL] => ) [7] => Array ( [ArticleID] => 120553 [Title] => Pagmamatyag sa Oposisyon: Labag sa Batas [Summary] => Ang pagmamatyag sa pamamagitan ng pagmonitor sa telepono ng mga lider ng Oposisyon, senador, congressmen mga journalists ay isang malinaw na paglabag sa batas at karapatang itinatakda ng Saligang Batas. Isa ako sa mga biktima nito. Noon pang unang bahagi ng taong ito, natuklasan na namin na maraming miyembro ng Oposisyon ang na-tapped ang telepono. Ibig sabihin nito ay may nakikinig at sumusubaybay sa telepono sa aming opisina sa Kamara at sa aming bahay.
[DatePublished] => 2000-12-22 00:00:00 [ColumnID] => 133272 [Focus] => 0 [AuthorID] => [AuthorName] => [SectionName] => PSN Opinyon [SectionUrl] => opinyon [URL] => ) ) )
abtest
Are you sure you want to log out?
X
Login

Philstar.com is one of the most vibrant, opinionated, discerning communities of readers on cyberspace. With your meaningful insights, help shape the stories that can shape the country. Sign up now!

Get Updated:

Signup for the News Round now

FORGOT PASSWORD?
SIGN IN
or sign in with