+ Follow AFTER PASTOR Tag
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 289599
[Title] => Eavesdropping not wiretapping
[Summary] => Is the use of telephone extension to overhear a private conversation prohibited by RA 4200 otherwise known as the Anti-Wire Tapping Act? More specifically in this case, could a person called over the telephone and his lawyer listening on an extension line be imprisoned for violation of said law simply because the extension was used to enable them to both listen to an alleged attempt at extortion? This is the issue resolved in this case of Mario and Manny both lawyers.
[DatePublished] => 2005-08-03 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
AFTER PASTOR
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 289599
[Title] => Eavesdropping not wiretapping
[Summary] => Is the use of telephone extension to overhear a private conversation prohibited by RA 4200 otherwise known as the Anti-Wire Tapping Act? More specifically in this case, could a person called over the telephone and his lawyer listening on an extension line be imprisoned for violation of said law simply because the extension was used to enable them to both listen to an alleged attempt at extortion? This is the issue resolved in this case of Mario and Manny both lawyers.
[DatePublished] => 2005-08-03 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
abtest