Biden revokes Trump’s health insurance ban

IMMIGRATION CORNER - Michael J. Gurfinkel - The Philippine Star

On May 14, 2021, President Biden revoked former president Trump’s proclamation of Oct. 4, 2019, which would have barred the entry of immigrants unless they could prove they already had health insurance, could secure health insurance within 30 days of entry or had the financial capacity to cover their health care costs.

I have already posted a video on this topic on my YouTube channel, US Immigration TV, and I invite you to watch that video, as well as other immigration videos I posted. So make sure you subscribe to my channel, as well as like and share with other people you think could benefit from this news as well as the latest immigration updates.

It was estimated that if Trump’s proclamation had taken effect, it could have barred the entry of as many as two-thirds of legal immigrants. Trump’s insurance proclamation could have easily prevented elderly parents, family members with certain medical conditions and poor people from being able to immigrate.

According to President Biden, Trump’s health care proclamation did not “advance the interests of the United States.” Instead, Biden stated that his administration “is committed to expanding access to quality, affordable health care.” This could be achieved “without barring the entry of noncitizens who seek to immigrate lawfully to this country but who lack significant financial means or have not purchased health care insurance coverage from a restrictive list of qualifying plans.”

This is a welcome relief from Trump’s restrictive policies, especially when it came to public charge. As you recall, Trump tried to restrict people from immigrating if a consul believed it was likely that they would ever seek public benefits at any time in the future. He also tried to restrict people from immigrating if the petitioner had ever received certain public benefits. With his 2019 proclamation, Trump wanted to make sure people who immigrated could provide their own health care coverage and if they could not, they could be refused a visa.

Now, fortunately, we are going back to the policies on public charge that had been in effect since 1999. Of course, the petitioner must still give an affidavit of support and meet the poverty guidelines.

But if you have a family member who is being processed for an immigrant visa abroad, and you have any questions or issues about their eligibility, whether it is for public charge or any other item, I would strongly suggest that you seek advice and assistance of an attorney. I know many people try to first do filing of immigration application themselves, and then if they are denied or refused, they see an attorney. But once a case is denied at the embassy, it could be very difficult to get the denial or refusal reopened or overturned. In many cases, the embassy will immediately send the case back to USCIS, where it could take years before you can be given a chance to argue eligibility.

But still, this is great news, as it is one less item people have to worry about as grounds for denial or refusal.

*      *      *

Website: www.gurfinkel.com

Follow us on Facebook.com/GurfinkelLaw, YouTube: US Immigration TV and Instagram.com/gurfinkellaw

Four offices to serve you: Los Angeles, San Francisco, New York: toll free: 1-866-GURFINKEL (1-866-487-3465) Philippines: +632 8894-0258 or +632 8894-0239

  • Latest
  • Trending
Are you sure you want to log out?

Philstar.com is one of the most vibrant, opinionated, discerning communities of readers on cyberspace. With your meaningful insights, help shape the stories that can shape the country. Sign up now!

or sign in with