Reactions to latest motoring policies

Not many motoring columns tackle as a matter of course transportation and traffic management issues as they equally do auto industry concerns and developments. And this column counts itself as one of the few in its more than two decades of broadsheet life.

Having said that we have had our more than a fair share of reactions from the general motoring public to motoring problems, transport and traffic management policies and other government pronouncements.

Lately quite a few government pronouncements have been made one after the other and have elicited varied responses, some negative, some apprehensive and some approving, though the latter come few and far in between.

Let’s take what has been announced very recently requiring events organizers to submit traffic routes and management recommendations prior to having their events approved for staging by the MMDA.

I understand this is in reaction to the increased traffic gridlocks that happened during Valentine’s Day, which the MMDA blames on the highly successful concert that was held on the same day.

To begin with, I have been going out on dates on Valentine’s Day since I was old enough to (and that has been quite a time from now) and year in and year out, that was always the case. Streets were always clogged with vehicles going to and fro. Most people were out travelling to some place to mark the special day. And I don’t limit this to lovers or couples but including entire families. And this was long before there was any kind of mass transport like the MRT or the LRT or the slew of half empty or half full buses that traverse EDSA—long before the metro’s daily traffic mess.

The general reaction we got from the pronouncement was that the blame should not be centered on the event. There’s a daily traffic nightmare in the metro to begin with and an increase in the volume of vehicles on the road on a special day like Valentine’s Day should be expected and prepared for—whether there’s a scheduled event or none.

And the reaction from event organizers is simple, “Our expertise is to conceive and manage events with the end of attracting warm bodies to be present. Not to manage traffic nor design traffic routes. We concede that you should be advised about the event, but isn’t that part of the bureaucracy when we get our permits approved by the local government?”

With all due respect to the MMDA, to me that argument of event organizers seems to make a lot of sense.

Now on the other side of the coin the MMDA’s “No Jeepney in EDSA” policy is being met by a “double thumbs up” reaction from motorists. It’s actually a long time coming and many are wondering why only now, with a keen eye on the many past traffic administrations failing to see this or just had their eyes shut to the problem. The jeepneys’ presence, adding to the over crowding of buses (still many are colorums, I was told) in EDSA are major causes of the metro’s daily traffic woes.

The “double thumbs up” rating from motorists did not come undeserved or overvalued. Simply because unlike some government policies that were just announced and implemented sans due diligence as to their consequences, the MMDA also made sure that the alternative routes assigned to the EDSA-banned jeepneys were cleared of illegally parked vehicles and vendors by the MMDA for easier access.

Giving credit where credit is due—Kudos to the MMDA for the political will to implement the policy and the preparedness for its implementation.

In another development we have received reports that the MMDA is cracking down on jaywalkers especially those PUV passengers that alight or board in the middle of the road or in non-designated loading and unloading areas. The report also cited that a total of 2,211 violators have been apprehended from January 1 to February 14 this year. What seems to be lacking in the report is whether the drivers who allowed the passengers to board or alight in these areas were similarly apprehended. Remember, “it takes two to tango”—both passenger and driver should be apprehended and cited separately for different offences—the passenger for jaywalking and the driver for its appropriate traffic violation. And you better believe it, this malpractice of wanton loading and unloading anywhere, especially in the middle of the road disrupting the flow of traffic is one of the many major causes of traffic gridlocks—some even end in road rage conflicts.

The motorists’ reaction to this is apprehension. As to how long would the crackdown last—another ningas cogon?

Now here’s a government statement via an official memorandum that reportedly elicited some puzzled reactions from some members of the auto industry—a uniform spec for the conduction sticker-based temporary plates for motorists to use in lieu of their yet-to-be-released registration plates from the LTO. This is in response to how the temporary plates are currently coming in various designs as vehicle owners patiently wait for four long years now for the release of the official plates, which continue to be delayed due to a myriad of legal problems.

With puzzled looks in their faces as they read the memo from the LTO, many in the industry are now asking, “So these are the specs. Now, who’s going to pick up the tab in producing these conduction sticker-based temporary plates?”

I’m sure the no nonsense LTO head, Asec. Edgar Galvante meant well in releasing the specs for a uniform look in form as well as in substance of all temporary plates instead of an all mixed up “labo-labo” look that makes it very difficult to remember how the temporary plate of a vehicle that’s involved in a criminal activity or accident looks like in making a report.

But then it also makes sense for anybody in the private sector who’s going to foot the bill in producing these temporary plates to ask, “Why me?”

I guess the better approach for the LTO would be, “Inasmuch as you are making these temporary plates yourself, you might as well do them this way for a uniform look—just a suggestion, a very strong one.”

As for me, it’s just a thought. But then, why not think about it?

Websites For Motoring And Auto Enthusiasts

When you click on www.motoringtoday.ph you would get an update on the latest issues and developments in the country’s transportation and traffic management concerns including the latest news in the local auto industry. You’ll also have inputs on road safety and vehicle maintenance. A Showcase page spotlights the latest automobile models available in the country. And more inputs about the world of motoring.

Now, when you check out www.autofocus.com.ph it’s the website that’s exclusive to the automobile and its industry with a slew of car reviews and feature-to-feature, head-to-head comparisons of the latest car models in the local market. If you are an auto enthusiast—this website is a must.

Happy Motoring!!!

For comments and inquiries email [email protected].